Reynolds v. Stouffer
This text of 569 F. App'x 166 (Reynolds v. Stouffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John Reynolds appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reynolds v. Stouffer, No. 8:13-cv-00824-DKC, 2014 WL 576299 (D.Md. Feb. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
569 F. App'x 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-stouffer-ca4-2014.