Reynolds v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Reynolds v. State

161 S.W.2d 1086

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 13, 1942

DocketNo. 22112

StatusPublished

This text of 161 S.W.2d 1086 (Reynolds v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reynolds v. State, 161 S.W.2d 1086 (Tex. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder with malice, and his punishment assessed at thirty-five years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The motion for a new trial contains matters alleged to be errors committed upon the trial of this cause, which we are unable to correctly appraise on account of the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exceptions.

All proceedings herein seem to be regular, and we have no other alternative than to affirm the judgment, which is accordingly done.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder with malice, and his punishment assessed at thirty-five years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The motion for a new trial contains matters alleged to be errors committed upon the trial of this cause, which we are unable to correctly appraise on account of the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exceptions.

All proceedings herein seem to be regular, and we have no other alternative than to affirm the judgment, which is accordingly done.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 S.W.2d 1086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-state-texcrimapp-1942.