Reynolds v. State

199 S.W. 1092, 82 Tex. Crim. 505, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 12
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 16, 1918
DocketNo. 4470.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 199 S.W. 1092 (Reynolds v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reynolds v. State, 199 S.W. 1092, 82 Tex. Crim. 505, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 12 (Tex. 1918).

Opinions

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

The conviction herein was for a misdemeanor. The purported original recognizance was fatally defective. (2 Vernon’s Ann. Crim. Stats., p. 882.) At his instance this court gave" appellant leave to enter into a new recognizance in the terms required by the statute. Since then he has enterd into another purported recognizance and now files it herein. It likewise is fatally derective. (2 Vernon’s Ann. Crim. Stats., p. 884.) As neither recognizance gives this court jurisdiction, the appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ralph v. State
148 S.W.2d 401 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 S.W. 1092, 82 Tex. Crim. 505, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-state-texcrimapp-1918.