Reynolds v. State
199 S.W. 1092, 82 Tex. Crim. 505, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 12
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 16, 1918·No. No. 4470.·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
The conviction herein was for a misdemeanor. The purported original recognizance was fatally defective. (2 Vernon’s Ann. Crim. Stats., p. 882.) At his instance this court gave" appellant leave to enter into a new recognizance in the terms required by the statute. Since then he has enterd into another purported recognizance and now files it herein. It likewise is fatally derective. (2 Vernon’s Ann. Crim. Stats., p. 884.) As neither recognizance gives this court jurisdiction, the appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reynolds v. State, 199 S.W. 1092, 82 Tex. Crim. 505, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 12 (Tex. 1918).
199 S.W. 1092 (Reynolds v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ralph v. State
148 S.W.2d 401 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1941)