Reynolds v. State
1926 OK CR 374, 249 P. 1117, 35 Okla. Crim. 233, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 361
This text of 1926 OK CR 374 (Reynolds v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reynolds v. State, 1926 OK CR 374, 249 P. 1117, 35 Okla. Crim. 233, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 361 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).
Opinion
Hughie Reynolds was convicted of an assault and battery, and he appeals. The plaintiff in error has filed his motion to dismiss the appeal, and upon consideration thereof the motion is allowed, and *234 the appeal dismissed, and a mandate order issued, with instructions to execute the judgment rendered in the trial court, in accordance with its terms.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1926 OK CR 374, 249 P. 1117, 35 Okla. Crim. 233, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-state-oklacrimapp-1926.