Reynolds v. State
1926 OK CR 374, 249 P. 1117, 35 Okla. Crim. 233, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 361
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reynolds v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Okla. Crim. 353 →
Opinion
Hughie Reynolds was convicted of an assault and battery, and he appeals. The plaintiff in error has filed his motion to dismiss the appeal, and upon consideration thereof the motion is allowed, and *234 the appeal dismissed, and a mandate order issued, with instructions to execute the judgment rendered in the trial court, in accordance with its terms.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reynolds v. State, 1926 OK CR 374, 249 P. 1117, 35 Okla. Crim. 233, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 361 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).
1926 OK CR 374 (Reynolds v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.