Reynolds v. State
This text of 40 S.E. 234 (Reynolds v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. It is a well-settled rule of criminal law, that, on the trial of one indicted for a misdemeanor, the case may he made out hy proof that the accused committed the act which constituted the offense charged, at any time within two years previously to the return of the indictment as true.
'2. That the indictment charged the accused with having unlawfully sold spirituous liquors to a named person on a particular day does not change the rule ; such a conviction may he pleaded in har of another conviction for an illegal sale to the person named, within the statutory period.
3. The evidence was amply sufficient to sustain the verdict, and no error of law was committed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 S.E. 234, 114 Ga. 265, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-state-ga-1901.