Reynolds v. State

773 So. 2d 1211, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15973, 2000 WL 1800585
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reynolds v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4789
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 2000·No. No. 2D00-2973·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lisa Reynolds appeals the summary denial of her motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), in which she alleges that she is entitled to be resentenced under the authority of Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). The trial court denied relief, stating that Reynolds was sentenced as a habitual offender, making Heggs inapplicable to her sentence. However, the trial court failed to attach to its order any record documents which reflect that she was sentenced as a habitual offender. We therefore reverse and remand for attachment of those portions of the record which conclusively refute Reynold’s claim or for further proceedings on this issue.

Reversed and remanded.

FULMER, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT and GREEN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds v. State, 773 So. 2d 1211, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15973, 2000 WL 1800585 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

773 So. 2d 1211 (Reynolds v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)