Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Reynolds v. State

Reynolds v. State

598 So. 2d 305, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6048, 1992 WL 104633
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reynolds v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 590 So. 2d 1043 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 20, 1992·No. No. 91-1215·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We find that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction of appellant as to the possession of cocaine and, therefore, the trial judge erred in denying the motion for judgment of acquittal. We reverse the conviction and sentence as to this count and, thus, find it unnecessary to reach appellant’s other issues.

SHIVERS and MINER, JJ., concur. WOLF, J., dissents with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds v. State, 598 So. 2d 305, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6048, 1992 WL 104633 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

598 So. 2d 305 (Reynolds v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.