Reynolds v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Reynolds v. State

473 So. 2d 293, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14754

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reynolds v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 429 So. 2d 1331 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 2, 1985·No. No. 84-2647·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s substantive points are without merit. He also expresses concern over the wording of the judge’s order which reduces his sentence so as to fall within the sentencing guidelines. We construe the judge’s order reducing his sentence to five and one-half years to refer to both the sentence entered for conspiracy to traffic in cocaine and the concurrent sentence for the sale of cocaine.

Affirmed.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and DANAHY and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s substantive points are without merit. He also expresses concern over the wording of the judge’s order which reduces his sentence so as to fall within the sentencing guidelines. We construe the judge’s order reducing his sentence to five and one-half years to refer to both the sentence entered for conspiracy to traffic in cocaine and the concurrent sentence for the sale of cocaine.

Affirmed.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and DANAHY and HALL, JJ., concur.

Reynolds v. State, 473 So. 2d 293, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14754 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

473 So. 2d 293 (Reynolds v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.