Reynolds v. State

Florida Circuit Courts

Reynolds v. State

45 Fla. Supp. 2d 23

CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida

DecidedOctober 26, 1990

DocketCase No. 88-88AC

StatusPublished

This text of 45 Fla. Supp. 2d 23 (Reynolds v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reynolds v. State, 45 Fla. Supp. 2d 23 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

MARK SPEISER, Circuit Judge.

THIS CAUSE having come before this Court pursuant to Jack Reynolds’ Appeal to the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit to review the specific issues argued at the petitioner’s Motion to Suppress in County Court, Case No. 88-8024 M.M., and this Court acting in its Appellate capacity, having heard the arguments of the respective counsel, reviewed the court record and considered the same, it is hereby,

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Trial Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Relying upon State of Florida v William N. Eldridge, 15 FLW [24]*24D1880 (July 27, 1990), this Court finds that the lower Court did not err as a matter of law in denying Jack Reynolds’ Motion to Suppress when he was arrested by an officer who was called to the accident scene after the accident investigation had begun and had no involvement with the accident investigation. This matter is hereby remanded to the trial court for the imposition of sentence.

DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 26th day of October, 1990.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

MARK SPEISER, Circuit Judge.

THIS CAUSE having come before this Court pursuant to Jack Reynolds’ Appeal to the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit to review the specific issues argued at the petitioner’s Motion to Suppress in County Court, Case No. 88-8024 M.M., and this Court acting in its Appellate capacity, having heard the arguments of the respective counsel, reviewed the court record and considered the same, it is hereby,

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Trial Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Relying upon State of Florida v William N. Eldridge, 15 FLW [24]*24D1880 (July 27, 1990), this Court finds that the lower Court did not err as a matter of law in denying Jack Reynolds’ Motion to Suppress when he was arrested by an officer who was called to the accident scene after the accident investigation had begun and had no involvement with the accident investigation. This matter is hereby remanded to the trial court for the imposition of sentence.

DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 26th day of October, 1990.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 Fla. Supp. 2d 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-state-flacirct-1990.