Reynolds v. State

193 So. 818, 141 Fla. 783, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 858
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 16, 1940·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record' having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Ci-iapman, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Buford and Thomas not participating as authorized by Section 4677, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds v. State, 193 So. 818, 141 Fla. 783, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 858 (Fla. 1940).

193 So. 818 (Reynolds v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Press
105 A.2d 905 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)