Reynolds v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Reynolds v. State

104 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 693

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 26, 1925

Docket4 Div. 107.

StatusPublished

This text of 104 So. 924 (Reynolds v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reynolds v. State, 104 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 693 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder, and appeals. It would serve no useful purpose to discuss the evidence. No exceptions were reserved to the admission or rejection of any part of same, and the guilt vel non of the defendant was properly submitted to the jury, under appropriate instructions as to the law, to no part of which any objection was made. There were no written charges refused to defendant, and the appeal appears to have been taken merely for delay. Let the judgment be affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder, and appeals. It would serve no useful purpose to discuss the evidence. No exceptions were reserved to the admission or rejection of any part of same, and the guilt vel non of the defendant was properly submitted to the jury, under appropriate instructions as to the law, to no part of which any objection was made. There were no written charges refused to defendant, and the appeal appears to have been taken merely for delay. Let the judgment be affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-state-alactapp-1925.