Reynolds v. Singletary
This text of 677 So. 2d 988 (Reynolds v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus was denied for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Appellee files a motion to relinquish jurisdiction asserting that it has determined that appellant did, in fact, exhaust his administrative remedies. Appellee submits that this court should relinquish jurisdiction to allow the trial court to consider the merits of the petition. We elect to construe appellee’s motion to relinquish jurisdiction as a confession of error. This cause is REVERSED and REMANDED to the trial court to consider the merits of appellant’s claims.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
677 So. 2d 988, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8492, 1996 WL 449518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1996.