Reynolds v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided June 21, 2022·No. 20-1165·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-1165V UNPUBLISHED

HOLLY REYNOLDS, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: May 11, 2022 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Shoulder Respondent. Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Leigh Finfer, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Alexa Roggenkamp, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On September 9, 2020, Holly Reynolds filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table Injury, after receiving the tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine on October 24, 2018. Petition at 1, ¶ 2. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On December 20, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her SIRVA. On May 4, 2022, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $100,359.40, representing compensation in the amount of $100,000.00 for her actual pain and

1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). suffering, $264.00 for her past unreimbursable expenses, and $95.40 for satisfaction of the State of Oregon Medicaid lien. Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award $100,359.40 as follows:

1. A lump sum payment of $100,264.00, representing $100,000.00 for her actual pain and suffering and $264.00 for her actual unreimbursable expenses in the form of a check payable to Petitioner; and

2. A lump sum payment of $95.40, representing reimbursement of a Medicaid lien for services rendered to Petitioner by the State of Oregon, in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioner and to:

ODHS/Personal Injury Liens # 503109 PO Box 14512 Salem, OR 97309

Proffer at 2-3. Petitioner agrees to endorse the check to Personal Injury Liens Unit (PIL) for satisfaction of the Medicaid lien. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

HOLLY REYNOLDS,

Petitioner, No. 20-1165V Chief Special Master Corcoran v. ECF

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

RESPONDENT’S REVISED PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On September 9, 2020, Holly Reynolds (“petitioner”), filed a Petition for compensation

under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended (“the Vaccine Act” or

“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34, alleging that she suffered a shoulder injury related to

vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) in her left shoulder as a result of a Tetanus, Diphtheria, and

Acellular Pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine administered on October 24, 2018. Petition (“Pet.”) at 1.

On December 17, 2021, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule

4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act,

and the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to

compensation on December 20, 2021. ECF No. 26; ECF No. 28.

I. Items of Compensation

A. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that Holly Reynolds should be awarded $100,000.00 in actual pain

and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees. B. Past, Unreimbursible Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past unreimbursable

expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be

awarded $264.00 in past, unreimbursible expenses. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(B).

Petitioner agrees.

C. Medicaid Lien

Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded funds to satisfy a State of Oregon

Medicaid lien in the amount of $95.40, which represents full satisfaction of any right of

subrogation, assignment, claim, lien, or cause of action the State of Oregon may have against any

individual as a result of any Medicaid payments the State of Oregon has made to or on behalf of

petitioner from the date of her eligibility for benefits through the date of judgment in this case as

a result of her alleged vaccine-related injury suffered on or about October 24, 2018, under Title

XIX of the Social Security Act.

The above amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be

entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner be made through two

lump sum payments as described below:

1) A lump sum payment of $100,264.00 in the form of a check payable to

petitioner. 1

1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings and future pain and suffering.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2022).

Reynolds v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Reynolds v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a