Reynolds v. Ritch

93 F. 990, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3039

This text of 93 F. 990 (Reynolds v. Ritch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reynolds v. Ritch, 93 F. 990, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3039 (circtsdny 1899).

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

(1) The motion to require defendants to appear, demur, plead, or answer to the cross bill is denied. (2) The motion that this cause be heard with the principal cause instituted in the original bill by Emma S. Eayerweather and others is denied, with leave to renew when this cause is actually ready for- hearing. (3) The motion that the testimony taken by the complainant under the replication to the plea and answer of trustees of Hamilton College to said original bill stand and be read and received with the same force and effect as if the. same had been taken in support of the cross bill is granted. (4) The motion to stay proceedings is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 F. 990, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-ritch-circtsdny-1899.