Reynolds v. REYNOLDS (NOW FLYNN)

569 S.E.2d 645
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 4, 2002·No. 38A02·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

569 S.E.2d 645 (2002)

David P. REYNOLDS,
v.
Cynthia W. REYNOLDS (NOW FLYNN). Cynthia Flynn (formerly Reynolds) David P.Reynolds.

No. 38A02.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 4, 2002.

*646 James, McElroy & Diehl, P.A. by William K. Diehl, Jr. and Preston O. Odom, III, Charlotte, for appellant Cynthia Flynn (formerly Reynolds).

Horack, Talley, Pharr & Lowndes, P.A. by Thomas R. Cannon and Kary C. Watson, Charlotte, for appellee David Reynolds.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds v. REYNOLDS (NOW FLYNN), 569 S.E.2d 645 (N.C. 2002).

569 S.E.2d 645 (Reynolds v. REYNOLDS (NOW FLYNN)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tyll v. Berry
758 S.E.2d 411 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014)
Eddings v. SOUTHERN ORTHOPEDIC & MUSCULOSKELETAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
569 S.E.2d 645 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2002)