Reynolds v. REYNOLDS (NOW FLYNN)
This text of 569 S.E.2d 645 (Reynolds v. REYNOLDS (NOW FLYNN)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David P. REYNOLDS,
v.
Cynthia W. REYNOLDS (NOW FLYNN). Cynthia Flynn (formerly Reynolds) David P.Reynolds.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
*646 James, McElroy & Diehl, P.A. by William K. Diehl, Jr. and Preston O. Odom, III, Charlotte, for appellant Cynthia Flynn (formerly Reynolds).
Horack, Talley, Pharr & Lowndes, P.A. by Thomas R. Cannon and Kary C. Watson, Charlotte, for appellee David Reynolds.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
569 S.E.2d 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-reynolds-now-flynn-nc-2002.