Reynolds v. Reynolds

97 S.W.3d 79, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2297, 2002 WL 31655169
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reynolds v. Reynolds. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1112
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 26, 2002·No. No. ED 80910·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Paul Reynolds (Father) appeals from the trial court’s Judgment and De[80]*80cree of Modification (Judgment) modifying the parties’ dissolution decree so that Robin Leigh Reynolds has sole custody of the parties’ minor child subject to Father’s reasonable visitation rights.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds v. Reynolds, 97 S.W.3d 79, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2297, 2002 WL 31655169 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

97 S.W.3d 79 (Reynolds v. Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.