Reynolds v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Reynolds v. Reynolds

802 So. 2d 636, 2001 La. LEXIS 3324, 2001 WL 1660870

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 29, 2001

DocketNo. 2001-CC-3052

StatusPublished

This text of 802 So. 2d 636 (Reynolds v. Reynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reynolds v. Reynolds, 802 So. 2d 636, 2001 La. LEXIS 3324, 2001 WL 1660870 (La. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Reynolds, Catherine L.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. John, 40th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 48,357; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 01-C-979.

Granted. The trial court made factual findings that relator did not wrongfully remove the child from Washington State and that it would be in the best interest of the child for Louisiana to assume jurisdiction over this matter. These factual findings are not clearly wrong. See Amin v. Bakhaty, 01-1967, pp. 16-18 (La.10/16/01), 798 So.2d 75, 86-88. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed, and the trial court is reinstated. Case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

VICTORY, J., would deny the writ application. TRAYLOR, J., would deny the writ application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Reynolds, Catherine L.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. John, 40th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 48,357; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 01-C-979.

Granted. The trial court made factual findings that relator did not wrongfully remove the child from Washington State and that it would be in the best interest of the child for Louisiana to assume jurisdiction over this matter. These factual findings are not clearly wrong. See Amin v. Bakhaty, 01-1967, pp. 16-18 (La.10/16/01), 798 So.2d 75, 86-88. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed, and the trial court is reinstated. Case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

VICTORY, J., would deny the writ application. TRAYLOR, J., would deny the writ application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

802 So. 2d 636, 2001 La. LEXIS 3324, 2001 WL 1660870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-reynolds-la-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack