Reynolds v. Reynolds
This text of Reynolds v. Reynolds (Reynolds v. Reynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION
LAURIE REYNOLDS,
Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:24-cv-67
v.
MARK ALAN REYNOLDS, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, and FLORIDA DMV,
Defendants.
O RDE R Plaintiff filed this action, asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. For the reasons that follow, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint within 14 days of the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order within the allotted time or to show cause why Plaintiff is unable to comply will result in dismissal without further notice for failure to prosecute and failure to follow a Court Order. Plaintiff has also filed a Motion for U.S. Marshal to Serve. Doc. 3. Since I am ordering Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint, the Court DENIES as premature Plaintiff’s Motion for U.S. Marshal to Serve. In addition, I GRANT Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Doc. 2. A federal court is required to conduct an initial screening of all complaints filed by prisoners and plaintiffs proceeding in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(a), 1915(a). During the initial screening, the court must identify any cognizable claims in the complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Additionally, the court must dismiss the complaint (or any portion of the complaint) that is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or which seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. The pleadings of unrepresented parties are held to a less stringent standard than those drafted by attorneys and, therefore, must be liberally construed. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). However, a plaintiff’s unrepresented status will not excuse mistakes regarding
procedural rules. McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, 113 (1993). A plaintiff’s complaint should contain a “short and plain statement” of the plaintiff’s claims, and each allegation in the complaint should be “simple, concise, and direct.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), (d). In order to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, a complaint must contain “sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). To state a claim, a complaint must contain “more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not” suffice. Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555. A plaintiff is not necessarily required to bring a separate action for each individual claim
against each individual defendant. In some circumstances, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow a plaintiff to name multiple defendants in a suit and to assert multiple claims in a single suit. Specifically, a plaintiff may name multiple defendants in a single action, but only if he asserts at least one claim against those defendants that arises from the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences, or if any question of law or fact common to all defendants will arise in the action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). Additionally, a plaintiff may assert multiple claims against a properly joined defendant in the same action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 18(a). Plaintiff seeks to sue Defendants residing in the State of Florida. Plaintiff’s claims arise from enforcement of a child support agreement made in the State of Florida and by Florida agencies. Plaintiff’s Complaint lacks enough factual detail for the Court to determine if it can properly exercise personal jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s § 1983 claims. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint within 14 days
of this Order. The Amended Complaint must comply with the following directions. The Court advises Plaintiff to read and follow these directions carefully: (1) The Amended Complaint must be on the Court-approved civil rights complaint form to be used by prisoners in actions arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1
(2) The Amended Complaint must be clearly labelled “Amended Complaint” and place the civil action number of this case on the first page of the form.
(3) No more than 10 pages may be attached to the form (this includes written allegations and attachments).
(4) The Amended Complaint must be legible with writing on only one side of each page.
(5) Each intended defendant must be identified by name or by sufficient details to describe the individual.
(6) The Amended Complaint should include only factual allegations concerning events where the rights of Plaintiff were violated or Plaintiff was injured, including the date and location of each alleged violation.
(7) The Amended Complaint must describe each alleged violation and identify each defendant responsible for each alleged violation.
(8) The Amended Complaint should not contain legal argument or conclusions.
(9) The Amended Complaint should contain allegations showing Defendants’ connections to the State of Georgia.
1 The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to send the appropriate 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint form and a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. Once filed, Plaintiff's Amended Complaint will supersede and replace his original Complaint. Therefore, Plaintiff must not refer back to the initial Complaint or any of its attachments and must not incorporate any part of the original complaint by reference in his Amended Complaint. Claims made against particular defendants in the Plaintiff's original Complaint are not preserved unless they are also set forth in the Amended Complaint. Failure to comply with this Order within the allotted time or to show cause why Plaintiff is unable to comply will result in dismissal without further notice for failure to prosecute and failure to follow a Court Order. Additionally, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to advise the Court in writing of any change of address during the pendency of this action. Plaintiffs failure to abide by this directive will result in the dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint, without prejudice, for failure to follow an Order of this Court. SO ORDERED, this 3rd day of March, 2025.
Bo 1 BENJAMIN W. CHEESBRO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reynolds v. Reynolds, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-reynolds-gasd-2025.