Reynolds v. Reynolds
This text of 60 S.E. 1053 (Reynolds v. Reynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Even if a meritoi’ious assignment of error can be predicated upon a refusal of a judge to allow oral evidence to be introduced upon a hearing for temporary alimony (see Rogers v. Rogers, 103 Ga. 763, 30 S. E. 659), such an assignment is not well taken when neither the oral evidence nor the substance thereof is set forth.
‘2. Expenses of litigation being part of the allowance of temporary alimony (Civil Code, § 2457, Stokes v. Stokes, 127 Ga. 160 (56 S. E. 303), “the judge may allow as counsel fees such sum as in his discretion appears proper under all the facts and circumstances of the case, although there is no evidence before him fixing any amount as the value of the services rendered and to be rendered by the [wife’s] counsel.” Sweat v. Sweat, 123 Ga. 801 (51 S. E. 716).
3. The judgment rendered was sufficiently supported by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 S.E. 1053, 130 Ga. 460, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-reynolds-ga-1908.