Reynolds v. Reynolds

8 P. 184, 2 Cal. Unrep. 547, 1885 Cal. LEXIS 857
California Supreme Court·Decided October 10, 1885·No. No. 8849·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinions

MYRICK, J.

Motion for an order for the repayment of money under section 957, Code of Civil Procedure. When the ease was before us on appeal from the judgment (67 Cal. 176, 7 Pac. 480), we reversed that part of the judgment which directed the payment of one thousand dollars counsel fees by the defendant to the attorneys for the plaintiff; the action being for a divorce. It does not appear, from the affidavits used on the motion, that the money was paid after, and in consequence of, the judgment appealed from. If the money was paid in consequence of an order made prior to the judgment, such order was not appealed from. Motion denied, and order staying remittitur vacated.

I concur: Morrison, C. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds v. Reynolds, 8 P. 184, 2 Cal. Unrep. 547, 1885 Cal. LEXIS 857 (Cal. 1885).

8 P. 184 (Reynolds v. Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Youlian v. Williams
178 P.2d 756 (California Supreme Court, 1947)
Jackson v. Jackson
163 P.2d 780 (California Court of Appeal, 1945)
Weare v. Superior Court
273 P. 870 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)
Starkweather v. Eddy
235 P. 734 (California Supreme Court, 1925)
Anglo-California T. Co. v. Oakland Rys.
216 P. 578 (California Supreme Court, 1923)
Anglo-California Trust Co. v. Oakland Railways
191 Cal. 387 (California Supreme Court, 1923)
Bashore v. Lamberson
171 P. 968 (California Court of Appeal, 1918)