Reynolds v. Reiss
This text of 81 So. 884 (Reynolds v. Reiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.
March 21, 1916, plaintiff alleged in the district court that he had erred in moving for an appeal to the Court of Appeal, and he asked for and obtained an order of appeal to the Supreme Court.
Defendants allege that plaintiff and appellant abandoned his appeal to the Court of Appeal, and is therefore precluded from attempting to prosecute thereafter another appeal in the same matter, and ask that the appeal to this court be dismissed.
The first appeal to the Court of Appeal was never consummated by the filing of the bond named in the order of appeal. The district court retained jurisdiction of the matter, and it was within the power of said court to correct the error which had been made, and on motion of plaintiff to make the appeal returnable to the Supreme Court The first order of appeal was a nullity, as it granted the appeal to a court without jurisdiction, although the appeal might have been saved under the terms of Act 19, 1912, p. 26.
On the authorities of Jackson v. Michie, 33 La. Ann. 725, McWilliams v. Michel, 43 La. Ann. 986, 10 South. 11, and Yallee v. Hunsberry, 108 La. 136, 32 South. 359, the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 So. 884, 145 La. 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-reiss-la-1916.