Reynolds v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

449 A.2d 62, 303 Pa. Super. 31
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 5, 1982
Docket137
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 449 A.2d 62 (Reynolds v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reynolds v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, 449 A.2d 62, 303 Pa. Super. 31 (Pa. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Reynolds, twelve years of age, was killed when the bicycle on which he was riding was struck by an automobile on August 30, 1975 in Susquehanna Township, Dauphin County. At the time of his death, he was covered under a no-fault automobile insurance policy which had been issued to his father by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. An action in assumpsit was instituted by appellant, the administrator of the decedent’s estate, against the insurance ■company to recover work loss benefits under the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act. 1 Preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer were sustained and the complaint was dismissed because, the trial court held, a decedent’s estate was not a statutorily defined “victim” who was entitled to recover work loss benefits under the No-fault Act. The insurance company also argued, but the trial court found it unnecessary to consider, that the twelve year old decedent had not entered the work force and, therefore, had no calculable wage loss. This appeal followed. 2

These issues have been decided in favor of allowing recovery of work loss benefits by the estate of a deceased minor in Freeze v. Donegal Mutual Insurance Company, 301 Pa.Super. 344, 447 A.2d 999 (1982). See also: Chesler v. Government Employees Insurance Company, 302 Pa.Super. 356, 448 A.2d 1080 (1982). For reasons stated in Freeze, we reverse *33 the order dismissing appellant’s complaint in the instant case.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

1

. Act of July 19, 1974, P.L. 489, No. 176, 40 P.S. § 1009.101 et seq.

2

. By agreement of counsel, argument in this appeal was deferred pending decision in Allstate Insurance Company v. Heffner, 491 Pa. 447, 421 A.2d 629 (1980), aff’g, 265 Pa.Super. 181, 401 A.2d 1160 (1979).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Polson v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.
200 P.3d 1266 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2009)
Capanna v. Travelers Insurance
513 A.2d 397 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
Kraft v. Allstate Insurance
511 A.2d 1356 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
Colosimo v. Nationwide Insurance
473 A.2d 1102 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Kenny v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
473 A.2d 641 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Reynolds v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
470 A.2d 966 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
McQuaide v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
466 A.2d 643 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Kuchinski v. Donegal Mutual Insurance
30 Pa. D. & C.3d 166 (Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, 1983)
Smiley v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
455 A.2d 142 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Marryshow v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
452 A.2d 530 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
449 A.2d 62, 303 Pa. Super. 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-nationwide-mutual-insurance-pa-1982.