Reynolds v. National Chautauqua County Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reynolds v. National Chautauqua County Bank

250 A.D. 822, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9133

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 10, 1937·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur, Sears, P. J., not voting. (The order demes motion to vacate judgment in favor of plaintiff and to allow plaintiff’s husband to intervene, in an action to compel defendant bank to pay alimony to plaintiff from the income of a trust fund established for plaintiff’s husband.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur, Sears, P. J., not voting. (The order demes motion to vacate judgment in favor of plaintiff and to allow plaintiff’s husband to intervene, in an action to compel defendant bank to pay alimony to plaintiff from the income of a trust fund established for plaintiff’s husband.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.

Reynolds v. National Chautauqua County Bank, 250 A.D. 822, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9133 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

250 A.D. 822 (Reynolds v. National Chautauqua County Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.