Reynolds v. Lyon
This text of 20 Ga. 225 (Reynolds v. Lyon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
There was a waiver of copy and process in the other case, and the exemplification of that judgment was properly admitted. (Ibid.)
Writs of ji. fa. were issued in November, 1840. It was no objection to the admissibility in evidence of the record of the [228]*228judgments, that it did not show that the executions were dormant. It did not show that they had been returned. If the judgments had been satisfied, or were still vital and effective, it was a matter of defence.
The judgment of the Court below must be reversed, and a new trial is ordered, unless the plaintiff shall remit the amount of the judgment, principal, interest and costs, the exemplification of which was improperly admitted in evidence; and it is adjudged that the defendant in error pay the costs of prosecuting the case in this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 Ga. 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-lyon-ga-1856.