Reynolds v. Industrial Commission

53 P.2d 81, 88 Utah 192, 1936 Utah LEXIS 75
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reynolds v. Industrial Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 Utah 186
Utah Supreme Court·Decided January 6, 1936·No. No. 5468.·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

After hearing had before the Industrial Commission of Utah upon an application for compensation filed by plaintiff, an order was entered denying compensation. Plaintiff brought the cause here for review. In an opinion heretofore rendered, the action of the commission was affirmed. Reynolds v. Industrial Commission, 88 U. 186, 27 P. (2d) *193 28. Thereafter Mrs. Reynolds applied for and was granted a rehearing. Further oral arguments were had and the cause has been re-examined. After again reviewing the record we have concluded that the opinion heretofore rendered and published should stand as the opinion in this cause.

Such is the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds v. Industrial Commission, 53 P.2d 81, 88 Utah 192, 1936 Utah LEXIS 75 (Utah 1936).

53 P.2d 81 (Reynolds v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hammond v. Industrial Commission
34 P.2d 687 (Utah Supreme Court, 1934)
Bamberger Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission
240 P. 1103 (Utah Supreme Court, 1925)