Reynolds v. Great Northern Ry. Co.

168 F.2d 944, 36 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1158
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 14, 1948·No. No. 13582·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.

This case involves the same question as, Reynolds v. Northern Pacific Railway Company, 2 Cir., 168 F.2d 934, and Reynolds v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company, 8 Cir., 168 F.2d 943. The action is one to recover employment taxes assessed against the Great Northern Railway Company in 1944 for the years 1936 to 1944, and paid by it, on workers who had performed boarding camp services, which the Addison Miller Company and its assignor, Addison Miller, Inc., had contracted to furnish to Great Northern. The District Court, as in the Northern Pacific and the Chicago, St. P., M. and O. cases, gave a judgment for refund. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Reynolds, D.C.Minn., 68 F. Supp. 499. The Collector has appealed.

On the basis of our opinion in the Northern Pacific case, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 168 F.2d 944, 36 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1158 (8th Cir. 1948).

168 F.2d 944 (Reynolds v. Great Northern Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related