Reynolds v. Great Northern Ry. Co.
This text of 168 F.2d 944 (Reynolds v. Great Northern Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case involves the same question as, Reynolds v. Northern Pacific Railway Company, 2 Cir., 168 F.2d 934, and Reynolds v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company, 8 Cir., 168 F.2d 943. The action is one to recover employment taxes assessed against the Great Northern Railway Company in 1944 for the years 1936 to 1944, and paid by it, on workers who had performed boarding camp services, which the Addison Miller Company and its assignor, Addison Miller, Inc., had contracted to furnish to Great Northern. The District Court, as in the Northern Pacific and the Chicago, St. P., M. and O. cases, gave a judgment for refund. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Reynolds, D.C.Minn., 68 F. Supp. 499. The Collector has appealed.
On the basis of our opinion in the Northern Pacific case, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 F.2d 944, 36 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-great-northern-ry-co-ca8-1948.