Reynolds v. Florida Mobile Homes, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Reynolds v. Florida Mobile Homes, Inc.

195 So. 2d 561

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reynolds v. Florida Mobile Homes, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3461 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 7, 1966·No. No. 35490·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 26, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The motion of petitioner for attorney’s fees in this Court is denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 26, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The motion of petitioner for attorney’s fees in this Court is denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Reynolds v. Florida Mobile Homes, Inc., 195 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

195 So. 2d 561 (Reynolds v. Florida Mobile Homes, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.