Reynolds v. Fahey

55 A. 221, 20 Del. 264, 4 Penne. 264, 1903 Del. LEXIS 15
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedFebruary 17, 1903
DocketNo. 124
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 A. 221 (Reynolds v. Fahey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reynolds v. Fahey, 55 A. 221, 20 Del. 264, 4 Penne. 264, 1903 Del. LEXIS 15 (Del. Ct. App. 1903).

Opinion

Lore, C. J.:

The affidavit of defense states a conclusion of law and not the facts upon which such conclusion is based. It sets out that the defendant does not owe the amount but does not state why, so that the Court can judge whether it is a legal defense or not.

Let judgment be entered notwithstanding the affidavit of defense.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berick v. Curran
179 A. 708 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A. 221, 20 Del. 264, 4 Penne. 264, 1903 Del. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-fahey-delsuperct-1903.