Reynolds v. Craus
This text of 16 N.Y.S. 792 (Reynolds v. Craus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the authority of Wayland v. Tysen, 45 N. Y. 281, and Thompson v. Railway Co., Id. 471, this order must be reversed, The cases cited by respondent were all decided before the two eases above cited,' and, so far as they hold that a general denial can be stricken out as sham, are overruled. The only variation from the rule as laid down in these cases has been where a party has been examined before trial, and has admitted the falsity of the answer. Order reversed, with costs to abide event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 N.Y.S. 792, 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 624, 62 Hun 620, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-craus-nysupct-1891.