Reynolds v. Commissioner of Social Security

W.D. Washington

Reynolds v. Commissioner of Social Security

DecidedJune 24, 2025

Docket2:24-cv-01546

StatusUnknown

This text of Reynolds v. Commissioner of Social Security (Reynolds v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reynolds v. Commissioner of Social Security, (W.D. Wash. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 CAREY L. REYNOLDS, CASE NO. 2:24-cv-01546-DGE 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ON STIPULATED 12 v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES (DKT. NO. 13) 13 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ stipulated motion for attorneys’ fees 17 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). (Dkt. No. 13.) On March 18 18, 2025, the Parties stipulated that the case be reversed and remanded to the Commissioner of 19 Social Security for further administrative proceedings with respect to Plaintiff’s eligibility for 20 benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. (Dkt. No. 12.) The Parties now “stipulate 21 and agree that fees in the amount of $8,058.14 shall be awarded.” (Dkt. No. 13.) The requested 22 EAJA fee of $8,058.14 represents compensation for time Plaintiff’s attorneys and attorneys’ 23 paralegals spent in connection with this action. (See Dkt. No. 13-1 at 1–2.) Under the EAJA, the 24 1 attorney hours must be reflected in an “itemized statement [of] the actual time expended” and the 2 fee must be “reasonable.” 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B), 2412(d)(2)(A). The Parties have 3 provided the itemized record and the fee requested is reasonable under the rates published by the 4 Ninth Circuit. (Dkt. No. 13-1 at 2.) The request for compensation for paralegal time is 5 compensable under EAJA. See Nadarajah v. Holder, 569 F.3d 906, 918 (9th Cir. 2009).

6 Accordingly, the Parties’ motion (Dkt. No. 13) is GRANTED. It is hereby ORDERED 7 that fees in the amount of $8,058.14 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to 8 Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Attorney and paralegal fees in the amount of $8,058.14 will be 9 paid to Plaintiff’s attorney, subject to verification that Plaintiff does not have a debt which 10 qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as 11 discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check 12 shall be made out to Plaintiff’s attorney. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining 13 funds after offset of the debt shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney’s 14 office.

15 16 Dated this 24th day of June, 2025. 17 a 18 David G. Estudillo 19 United States District Judge

20 21 22 23 24

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 CAREY L. REYNOLDS, CASE NO. 2:24-cv-01546-DGE 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ON STIPULATED 12 v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES (DKT. NO. 13) 13 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ stipulated motion for attorneys’ fees 17 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). (Dkt. No. 13.) On March 18 18, 2025, the Parties stipulated that the case be reversed and remanded to the Commissioner of 19 Social Security for further administrative proceedings with respect to Plaintiff’s eligibility for 20 benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. (Dkt. No. 12.) The Parties now “stipulate 21 and agree that fees in the amount of $8,058.14 shall be awarded.” (Dkt. No. 13.) The requested 22 EAJA fee of $8,058.14 represents compensation for time Plaintiff’s attorneys and attorneys’ 23 paralegals spent in connection with this action. (See Dkt. No. 13-1 at 1–2.) Under the EAJA, the 24 1 attorney hours must be reflected in an “itemized statement [of] the actual time expended” and the 2 fee must be “reasonable.” 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B), 2412(d)(2)(A). The Parties have 3 provided the itemized record and the fee requested is reasonable under the rates published by the 4 Ninth Circuit. (Dkt. No. 13-1 at 2.) The request for compensation for paralegal time is 5 compensable under EAJA. See Nadarajah v. Holder, 569 F.3d 906, 918 (9th Cir. 2009).

6 Accordingly, the Parties’ motion (Dkt. No. 13) is GRANTED. It is hereby ORDERED 7 that fees in the amount of $8,058.14 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to 8 Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Attorney and paralegal fees in the amount of $8,058.14 will be 9 paid to Plaintiff’s attorney, subject to verification that Plaintiff does not have a debt which 10 qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as 11 discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check 12 shall be made out to Plaintiff’s attorney. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining 13 funds after offset of the debt shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney’s 14 office.

15 16 Dated this 24th day of June, 2025. 17 a 18 David G. Estudillo 19 United States District Judge

20 21 22 23 24

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Reynolds v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-commissioner-of-social-security-wawd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack