Reynolds v. City of Tecumseh

67 N.W. 792, 48 Neb. 785, 1896 Neb. LEXIS 145
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided June 3, 1896·No. No. 6624·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Norval, J.

This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries received by the plaintiff. Upon a trial of the issues to a jury a verdict was returned for the defendant. Plaintiff presented to the court a motion for a new trial, [786] which was overruled, and the following judgment was rendered, as shown by the journal entry: “It is therefore considered by the court that the said defendant recover of the said Nate Reynolds its costs herein expended, as heretofore by the verdict of the jury found.” This is merely a judgment for costs, and not a final adjudication disposing of the case. (Little v. Gamble, 47 Neb., 827, and cases there cited.) The record failing to show a final judgment, the petition in error is

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds v. City of Tecumseh, 67 N.W. 792, 48 Neb. 785, 1896 Neb. LEXIS 145 (Neb. 1896).

67 N.W. 792 (Reynolds v. City of Tecumseh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Root v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 OF CUSTER COUNTY
157 N.W.2d 877 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1968)
Gates v. Solomon
83 S.W. 348 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1904)
Hall v. Patterson
45 Fla. 353 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1903)