Reynolds v. City of New Rochelle

255 A.D. 1026, 9 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6301

This text of 255 A.D. 1026 (Reynolds v. City of New Rochelle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reynolds v. City of New Rochelle, 255 A.D. 1026, 9 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6301 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for injuries sustained as the result of a fall caused by tripping in a hole in a concrete sidewalk, judgment modified by setting aside the dismissal of the complaint on the merits as against the city of New Rochelle, and by granting a new trial as to it. As thus modified, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs to appellant to abide the event, and with costs to respondents Direct Realty Company and James Butler Grocery Co., as against [1027]*1027appellant. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 A.D. 1026, 9 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-city-of-new-rochelle-nyappdiv-1938.