Reynolds v. City of New Rochelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reynolds v. City of New Rochelle

255 A.D. 1026, 9 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6301

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 1938·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for injuries sustained as the result of a fall caused by tripping in a hole in a concrete sidewalk, judgment modified by setting aside the dismissal of the complaint on the merits as against the city of New Rochelle, and by granting a new trial as to it. As thus modified, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs to appellant to abide the event, and with costs to respondents Direct Realty Company and James Butler Grocery Co., as against [1027]*1027appellant. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for injuries sustained as the result of a fall caused by tripping in a hole in a concrete sidewalk, judgment modified by setting aside the dismissal of the complaint on the merits as against the city of New Rochelle, and by granting a new trial as to it. As thus modified, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs to appellant to abide the event, and with costs to respondents Direct Realty Company and James Butler Grocery Co., as against [1027]*1027appellant. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Reynolds v. City of New Rochelle, 255 A.D. 1026, 9 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6301 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

255 A.D. 1026 (Reynolds v. City of New Rochelle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.