Reynolds v. Chicago City Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Reynolds v. Chicago City Railway Co.

210 Ill. App. 379

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 29, 1918

DocketGen. No. 23,729

StatusPublished

This text of 210 Ill. App. 379 (Reynolds v. Chicago City Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reynolds v. Chicago City Railway Co., 210 Ill. App. 379 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Workmen’s Compensation Act, § 2*—when timgly rejection of act for forthcoming year not shown. Proof of the receipt by the Industrial Board less than 60 days before the expiration of the calendar year of an employer’s notice of its rejection of the Workmen’s Compensation for the forthcoming year is not sufficient to show the filing of the election to reject provided for in section 1 of the Act of 1913 [Callaghan’s 1916 St. Supp. f 5475(1)], even though it is shown that the notice was mailed more than 60 days before the expiration of the year, but to a wrong address.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Workmen’s Compensation Act, § 2*—when timgly rejection of act for forthcoming year not shown. Proof of the receipt by the Industrial Board less than 60 days before the expiration of the calendar year of an employer’s notice of its rejection of the Workmen’s Compensation for the forthcoming year is not sufficient to show the filing of the election to reject provided for in section 1 of the Act of 1913 [Callaghan’s 1916 St. Supp. f 5475(1)], even though it is shown that the notice was mailed more than 60 days before the expiration of the year, but to a wrong address.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 Ill. App. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-chicago-city-railway-co-illappct-1918.