Reynolds v. Carpenter
This text of 3 Pin. 34 (Reynolds v. Carpenter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is clear from the authorities introduced by the counsel for the plaintiff in error, that the ruling of the court below, admitting the proffered evidence of the defendant in error, under the objection taken' thereto, was erroneous. There can be no doubt but that the case at bar was within the statute of frauds, and that the action could not be' maintained under the proof made.
.Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Pin. 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-carpenter-wis-1850.