Reynolds v. Alderman
This text of 72 So. 369 (Reynolds v. Alderman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In habeas corpus proceedings the Circuit Judge awarded the care, custody and control of Opal Alderman, a minor grand-daughter to the defendant in error, according to Ellen Reynolds formerly Mrs. M. Bruce Alderman, the mother of the minor, the right to have the custody of the child at least once a year for six weeks, the child not to be taken beyond the jurisdiction of the court. Writ of error was allowed and taken.
As it does not appear that the Circuit Judge abused his judicial discretion or violated any provision or settled principle of law in awarding the custody of the minor child, and as further orders may be made in the premises by the Circuit Judge as the welfare of the child and the rights of the parties may require, the order appealed from is affirmed.
All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 So. 369, 72 Fla. 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-alderman-fla-1916.