Reynolds v. Adams

Texas Supreme Court

Reynolds v. Adams

3 Tex. 167

Texas Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1848·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

■Chief Justice Hemphill

delivered the opinion of the court. The suit was commenced in 1813, and at the fall term, 1846, [168]*168the jury found a verdict for the defendants. There is no statement of facts, nor bills of exception, or errors alleged or assigned in the' record.

If there be error from the want of a discontinuance as to one-of the defendants not served with process, it is one which should not affect a judgment rendered for the defendant who appeared and contested the demand. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

■Chief Justice Hemphill

delivered the opinion of the court. The suit was commenced in 1813, and at the fall term, 1846, [168]*168the jury found a verdict for the defendants. There is no statement of facts, nor bills of exception, or errors alleged or assigned in the' record.

If there be error from the want of a discontinuance as to one-of the defendants not served with process, it is one which should not affect a judgment rendered for the defendant who appeared and contested the demand. The judgment is affirmed.

Reynolds v. Adams, 3 Tex. 167 (Tex. 1848).

Pincite

3 Tex. 167 (Reynolds v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related