Reynolds v. Adams

Texas Supreme Court

Reynolds v. Adams

3 Tex. 167

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1848

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 3 Tex. 167 (Reynolds v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reynolds v. Adams, 3 Tex. 167 (Tex. 1848).

Pincite

Opinion

■Chief Justice Hemphill

delivered the opinion of the court. The suit was commenced in 1813, and at the fall term, 1846, [168]*168the jury found a verdict for the defendants. There is no statement of facts, nor bills of exception, or errors alleged or assigned in the' record.

If there be error from the want of a discontinuance as to one-of the defendants not served with process, it is one which should not affect a judgment rendered for the defendant who appeared and contested the demand. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

■Chief Justice Hemphill

delivered the opinion of the court. The suit was commenced in 1813, and at the fall term, 1846, [168]*168the jury found a verdict for the defendants. There is no statement of facts, nor bills of exception, or errors alleged or assigned in the' record.

If there be error from the want of a discontinuance as to one-of the defendants not served with process, it is one which should not affect a judgment rendered for the defendant who appeared and contested the demand. The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Tex. 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-adams-tex-1848.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack