Home/Supreme Court/Reynolds Metals Co. v. Washington

Reynolds Metals Co. v. Washington

382 U.S. 160, 86 S. Ct. 315
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 22, 1965
DocketNo. 537
StatusPublished

This text of 382 U.S. 160 (Reynolds Metals Co. v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reynolds Metals Co. v. Washington, 382 U.S. 160, 86 S. Ct. 315 (1965).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
382 U.S. 160, 86 S. Ct. 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-metals-co-v-washington-scotus-1965.