Reynolds, Ex Parte Jacky Clay

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 10, 2009
DocketAP-76,165
StatusPublished

This text of Reynolds, Ex Parte Jacky Clay (Reynolds, Ex Parte Jacky Clay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reynolds, Ex Parte Jacky Clay, (Tex. 2009).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NO. AP-76,165




EX PARTE JACKY CLAY REYNOLDS, Applicant





ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 0417630A IN THE 8TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM HOPKINS COUNTY




           Per curiam.


O P I N I O N


            Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of indecency with a child and sentenced to ninety-nine years’ imprisonment. The Sixth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction, but reversed his sentence and remanded to the trial court for a new trial on punishment. Reynolds v. State, No. 06-05-00155-CR (Tex. App. – Texarkana, May 31, 2007). Applicant entered into a plea agreement with respect to punishment, and was re-sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment on October 1, 2007.

            Applicant contends, inter alia, that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to advise him of his right to file petition for discretionary review pro se. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.

            Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, it appears that appellate counsel failed to timely advise Applicant of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se from the court of appeals opinion affirming his conviction. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Sixth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 06-05-00154-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case No. 0417630 from the 8th Judicial District Court of Hopkins County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with the Sixth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: June 10, 2009

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Reynolds, Ex Parte Jacky Clay, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-ex-parte-jacky-clay-texcrimapp-2009.