Reynolds Et Ux. v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Reynolds Et Ux. v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

141 So. 298, 105 Fla. 367

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 2, 1932·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Reynolds Et Ux. v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 141 So. 298, 105 Fla. 367 (Fla. 1932).

Pincite

141 So. 298 (Reynolds Et Ux. v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related