Reynolds Energy Transport, LLC and Reynolds Transportation, Inc. v. Plains Marketing, L.P., Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., Plains Pipeline, L.P.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Reynolds Energy Transport, LLC and Reynolds Transportation, Inc. v. Plains Marketing, L.P., Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., Plains Pipeline, L.P.

DecidedOctober 10, 2022

Docket04-22-00450-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Reynolds Energy Transport, LLC and Reynolds Transportation, Inc. v. Plains Marketing, L.P., Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., Plains Pipeline, L.P. (Reynolds Energy Transport, LLC and Reynolds Transportation, Inc. v. Plains Marketing, L.P., Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., Plains Pipeline, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reynolds Energy Transport, LLC and Reynolds Transportation, Inc. v. Plains Marketing, L.P., Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., Plains Pipeline, L.P., (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

FILE COPY

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 10, 2022

No. 04-22-00450-CV

REYNOLDS ENERGY TRANSPORT, LLC and Reynolds Transportation, Inc., Appellants

v.

PLAINS MARKETING, L.P., Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., Plains Pipeline, L.P., Appellees

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022-CI-11568 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On October 6, 2022, appellants filed: (1) a “Motion for Appellate Review Under Rule 24.4”; and (2) an “Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief and Stay in Connection with Rule 24.2 Motion.” Both motions challenge the trial court’s October 5, 2022 order setting a supersedeas bond to stay execution of an underlying sanctions judgment against appellants. Appellees subsequently filed a response to appellants’ emergency motion. After reviewing appellants’ emergency motion and appellees’ response, we DENY appellants’ “Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief and Stay in Connection with Rule 24.2 Motion.” We further DENY appellants’ “Motion for Appellate Review Under Rule 24.4” to the extent that the motion challenges the trial court’s inclusion of the amount of the underlying sanctions judgment in the calculation of the supersedeas bond.

We invite appellees to file a response to appellants’ “Motion for Appellate Review Under Rule 24.4” to the extent that the motion challenges the interest rate applied in the trial court’s October 5, 2022 order. Appellees’ response, if any, is due by October 22, 2022.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice FILE COPY

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of October, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FILE COPY

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 10, 2022

No. 04-22-00450-CV

REYNOLDS ENERGY TRANSPORT, LLC and Reynolds Transportation, Inc., Appellants

v.

PLAINS MARKETING, L.P., Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., Plains Pipeline, L.P., Appellees

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022-CI-11568 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On October 6, 2022, appellants filed: (1) a “Motion for Appellate Review Under Rule 24.4”; and (2) an “Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief and Stay in Connection with Rule 24.2 Motion.” Both motions challenge the trial court’s October 5, 2022 order setting a supersedeas bond to stay execution of an underlying sanctions judgment against appellants. Appellees subsequently filed a response to appellants’ emergency motion. After reviewing appellants’ emergency motion and appellees’ response, we DENY appellants’ “Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief and Stay in Connection with Rule 24.2 Motion.” We further DENY appellants’ “Motion for Appellate Review Under Rule 24.4” to the extent that the motion challenges the trial court’s inclusion of the amount of the underlying sanctions judgment in the calculation of the supersedeas bond.

We invite appellees to file a response to appellants’ “Motion for Appellate Review Under Rule 24.4” to the extent that the motion challenges the interest rate applied in the trial court’s October 5, 2022 order. Appellees’ response, if any, is due by October 22, 2022.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice FILE COPY

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of October, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Reynolds Energy Transport, LLC and Reynolds Transportation, Inc. v. Plains Marketing, L.P., Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., Plains Pipeline, L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-energy-transport-llc-and-reynolds-transportation-inc-v-plains-texapp-2022.