Reynold K. Hughes, D.B.A. Fayette Stock Farm, for the Use and Benefit of Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company, and v. Doane Agricultural Service, Inc., and Doane Agricultural Service, Inc., for the Use and Benefit of St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, and v. Reynold K. Hughes, D.B.A. Fayette Stock Farm, And

Sixth Circuit

Reynold K. Hughes, D.B.A. Fayette Stock Farm, for the Use and Benefit of Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company, and v. Doane Agricultural Service, Inc., and Doane Agricultural Service, Inc., for the Use and Benefit of St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, and v. Reynold K. Hughes, D.B.A. Fayette Stock Farm, And

286 F.2d 428

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 14, 1960

Docket14190

StatusPublished

This text of 286 F.2d 428 (Reynold K. Hughes, D.B.A. Fayette Stock Farm, for the Use and Benefit of Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company, and v. Doane Agricultural Service, Inc., and Doane Agricultural Service, Inc., for the Use and Benefit of St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, and v. Reynold K. Hughes, D.B.A. Fayette Stock Farm, And) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reynold K. Hughes, D.B.A. Fayette Stock Farm, for the Use and Benefit of Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company, and v. Doane Agricultural Service, Inc., and Doane Agricultural Service, Inc., for the Use and Benefit of St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, and v. Reynold K. Hughes, D.B.A. Fayette Stock Farm, And, 286 F.2d 428 (6th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

286 F.2d 428

Reynold K. HUGHES, d.b.a. Fayette Stock Farm, for the Use and Benefit of Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
DOANE AGRICULTURAL SERVICE, INC., Defendant and Appellee.
DOANE AGRICULTURAL SERVICE, INC., for the Use and Benefit of St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, Defendant and Appellant,
v.
Reynold K. HUGHES, d.b.a. Fayette Stock Farm, Plaintiff and Appellee.

No. 14189.

No. 14190.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

December 14, 1960.

William I. McLain, Memphis, Tenn., and William F. Kirsch, Jr., Memphis, Tenn., Ramsay Wall, Frierson M. Graves, Jr., Memphis, Tenn., Shepherd, Heiskell, Williams, Beal & Wall, Memphis, Tenn., and Owens & McLain, Memphis, Tenn., on briefs, for Reynold K. Hughes, etc.

Robert M. Burton, Memphis, Tenn., Leo Bearman, Memphis, Tenn., on briefs, for Doane Agricultural Service, Inc.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER.

These two appeals were from a judgment rendered by the District Court in a single action involving the same parties and were heard together by this Court upon oral arguments, briefs and the record.

In our opinion, the findings of fact adopted by District Judge Boyd are supported by substantial evidence. We agree with his conclusions of law.

The judgment of the District Court is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

286 F.2d 428

Reynold K. HUGHES, d.b.a. Fayette Stock Farm, for the Use and Benefit of Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
DOANE AGRICULTURAL SERVICE, INC., Defendant and Appellee.
DOANE AGRICULTURAL SERVICE, INC., for the Use and Benefit of St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, Defendant and Appellant,
v.
Reynold K. HUGHES, d.b.a. Fayette Stock Farm, Plaintiff and Appellee.

No. 14189.

No. 14190.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

December 14, 1960.

William I. McLain, Memphis, Tenn., and William F. Kirsch, Jr., Memphis, Tenn., Ramsay Wall, Frierson M. Graves, Jr., Memphis, Tenn., Shepherd, Heiskell, Williams, Beal & Wall, Memphis, Tenn., and Owens & McLain, Memphis, Tenn., on briefs, for Reynold K. Hughes, etc.

Robert M. Burton, Memphis, Tenn., Leo Bearman, Memphis, Tenn., on briefs, for Doane Agricultural Service, Inc.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER.

These two appeals were from a judgment rendered by the District Court in a single action involving the same parties and were heard together by this Court upon oral arguments, briefs and the record.

In our opinion, the findings of fact adopted by District Judge Boyd are supported by substantial evidence. We agree with his conclusions of law.

The judgment of the District Court is, therefore, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 F.2d 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynold-k-hughes-dba-fayette-stock-farm-for-the-use-and-benefit-of-ca6-1960.