Reynel v. . Kelly
1 N.C. 795
This text of 1 N.C. 795 (Reynel v. . Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reynel v. . Kelly, 1 N.C. 795 (kingsbench 1793).
Opinion
It is a fault in the original.
JONES and DODERIDGE, JJ., e contra. Here by the custos brevium it is certified that the declaration is on the writ. We cannot give judgment otherwise, for it does not appear to us. If it be certified, he may have an action on the case against the custos brevium. Antea, p. 712; postea, p. 803; 2 Cr., 674; 3 Cr., 287; Palm., 428; 2 Cr., 479. *Page 796
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynel-v-kelly-kingsbench-1793.