Reynel v. . Elworthy
1 N.C. 733
This text of 1 N.C. 733 (Reynel v. . Elworthy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reynel v. . Elworthy, 1 N.C. 733 (kingsbench 1793).
Opinion
Jermyn. I grant that every obligation which is not within the words (as our case is) is not within the meaning. Bewsage's case *and 21 H., 7, 16, 17. Where it was held that if a marshal brings one here, who is utlagatus to sue error, he may charge for his labor.
DODERIDGE, J., agreed to the distinction taken by Damport. Antea, p. 648; Poph., 165. *Page 734
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynel-v-elworthy-kingsbench-1793.