Reyna, Jesse Zuniga
This text of Reyna, Jesse Zuniga (Reyna, Jesse Zuniga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-92,539-01 & WR92,539-02
EX PARTE JESSE REYNA, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. D-18-2471-CR & D-18-2472-CR IN THE 358TH DISTRICT COURT FROM ECTOR COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant pleaded guilty to aggravated assault and evading arrest and was sentenced to
twenty years and ten years’ imprisonment. Applicant filed these applications for writs of habeas
corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded them to this Court. See TEX .
CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because trial counsel failed to properly
investigate and the State withheld favorable evidence from the defense. Applicant has alleged facts
that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent, 393
S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court
is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial 2
court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In developing the record, the trial
court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing,
it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. It appears Applicant is represented by counsel. If
Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel
to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or
retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleged
deficient performance. The trial court shall also make findings regarding Applicant’s claim that the
prosecution withheld favorable evidence from the defense. The trial court may make any other
findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: April 28, 2021 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reyna, Jesse Zuniga, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reyna-jesse-zuniga-texcrimapp-2021.