Reyes v. Wendt

Fourth Circuit

Reyes v. Wendt

223 F. App'x 244

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2007·No. No. 07-6183·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Reyes, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Reyes v. Wendt, No. 5:05-ev-00090-FPS, 2006 WL 3626390 (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Reyes, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Reyes v. Wendt, No. 5:05-ev-00090-FPS, 2006 WL 3626390 (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reyes v. Wendt, 223 F. App'x 244 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

223 F. App'x 244 (Reyes v. Wendt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related