Reyes v. Wal-Mart

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Reyes v. Wal-Mart

636 N.W.2d 794, 2001 Minn. LEXIS 816, 2001 WL 1632298

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 12, 2001·No. C9-01-1744·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 13, 2001, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 136.01, subd. 1(b).

Employee is awarded $600 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ALAN C. PAGE Associate Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 13, 2001, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 136.01, subd. 1(b).

Employee is awarded $600 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ALAN C. PAGE Associate Justice.

Reyes v. Wal-Mart, 636 N.W.2d 794, 2001 Minn. LEXIS 816, 2001 WL 1632298 (Mich. 2001).

Pincite

636 N.W.2d 794 (Reyes v. Wal-Mart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related