Reyes v. Superintendent LaManna

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 22, 2019·No. 1:18-cv-08724·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------x RODERICK REYES, : : Petitioner, : 18-CV-8724 (AT) (OTW) : -against- : ORDER : SUPERINTENDENT LAMANNA, : Respondent. : : -------------------------------------------------------------x ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge: The Court is in receipt of Petitioner’s request to extend his reply brief deadline. That request is GRANTED in part. In the Court’s October 23, 2019 Order, Petitioner was given the option pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005) of (a) abandoning any potentially unexhausted claims and proceeding only with the remaining exhausted claims or (b) proceeding with all claims at the risk of dismissal of the entire petition if the Court were to find lack of exhaustion. Petitioner must inform the Court of his decision by December 20, 2019, with no further extensions. Petitioner shall also file a reply to his Petition by December 20, 2019, but may request an extension of the reply deadline upon good cause. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to mail a copy of this Order to Petitioner. SO ORDERED. s/ Ona T. Wang Dated: November 22, 2019 Ona T. Wang New York, New York United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reyes v. Superintendent LaManna, (S.D.N.Y. 2019).

Reyes v. Superintendent LaManna (Reyes v. Superintendent LaManna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rhines v. Weber
544 U.S. 269 (Supreme Court, 2005)