Reyes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Reyes v. State

487 S.W.3d 502, 2016 WL 1578958, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 365

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 19, 2016

DocketED 103326

StatusPublished

This text of 487 S.W.3d 502 (Reyes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reyes v. State, 487 S.W.3d 502, 2016 WL 1578958, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 365 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wilfredo Reyes (Movant) ‘appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. R. Crim. P. 29.15 without ah evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court'did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wilfredo Reyes (Movant) ‘appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. R. Crim. P. 29.15 without ah evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court'did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

487 S.W.3d 502, 2016 WL 1578958, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reyes-v-state-moctapp-2016.