Reyes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Reyes v. State

642 So. 2d 644, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8815, 1994 WL 498002

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 14, 1994

DocketNo. 93-1458

StatusPublished

This text of 642 So. 2d 644 (Reyes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reyes v. State, 642 So. 2d 644, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8815, 1994 WL 498002 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

• We affirm defendant’s convictions. Defendant has not established that the asserted errors raised on appeal mandate reversal. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986). However, we reverse the sentences to the extent that the court imposed consecutive minimum mandatory sentences for counts II through VI. On remand, the trial court is directed to impose concurrent minimum mandatory sentences on those counts. State v. Boatwright, 559 So.2d 210 (Fla.1990); Ward v. State, 630 So.2d 217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Weatherspoon v. State, 624 So.2d 405 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

Convictions affirmed; sentences affirmed in part and reversed in part; and cause remanded for resentencing in accordance with this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

• We affirm defendant’s convictions. Defendant has not established that the asserted errors raised on appeal mandate reversal. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986). However, we reverse the sentences to the extent that the court imposed consecutive minimum mandatory sentences for counts II through VI. On remand, the trial court is directed to impose concurrent minimum mandatory sentences on those counts. State v. Boatwright, 559 So.2d 210 (Fla.1990); Ward v. State, 630 So.2d 217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Weatherspoon v. State, 624 So.2d 405 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

Convictions affirmed; sentences affirmed in part and reversed in part; and cause remanded for resentencing in accordance with this decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

642 So. 2d 644, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8815, 1994 WL 498002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reyes-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack