Reyes v. Panichi

232 A.D.2d 542, 648 N.Y.S.2d 945, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10444

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), dated December 4, 1995, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff has failed to raise a triable issue of fact that the damages he sought to recover for the injuries he allegedly sustained after being struck by falling bales of corrugated cardboard were recoverable on any theory pleaded against the defendant (see, Bernstein v City of New York, 69 NY2d 1020; Vinicio v Marriott Corp., 217 AD2d 656). Accordingly, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly granted (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reyes v. Panichi, 232 A.D.2d 542, 648 N.Y.S.2d 945, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10444 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

232 A.D.2d 542 (Reyes v. Panichi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Bernstein v. City of New York
511 N.E.2d 52 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Vinicio v. Marriott Corp.
217 A.D.2d 656 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)